arXiv — Nuance & Money Matter
A writer goes all-in on publisher-bashing and gets it all backwards
Sometimes, a story about scientific publishing in the popular press includes some inexplicable and superfluous cheap shots based on outlandish animosity.
Sheon Han’s profile in WIRED of Paul Ginsparg, the founder of arXiv, is one such example. In the piece, Han asserts that:
- Publishers are engaged in “thuggery.”
- Peer-review is unpaid “editing.”
- Preprints saved “millions of lives.”
Han seems to lack business sense. He doesn’t explore the financial problems that have plagued arXiv since the early 2000s, while casting aspersions at other successful businesses for no good reason. His stance against publishers — except those who pay him, apparently — is political.
It’s too bad, because Han’s profile of Ginsparg is extensive, not always flattering, and otherwise nuanced. Why Han felt he had to dump all over scientific publishers is beyond me. It only detracts from the piece.
- A more attentive editor might have intervened.
Before updating arXiv’s financial woes, let’s address the attacks.