bioRxiv/medRxiv Survey Results

In 2021, I ran a survey asking whether bioRxiv and medRxiv should disassociate themselves from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) given the way its leader, Mark Zuckerberg, comported himself and made products. It was a reputation issue — if you lie down with dogs, do you come up with fleas?

In 2021, results showed that people felt that bioRxiv and medRxiv were getting fleas, and thought they should move away from CZI and take a bath. More than 60% of respondents agreed bioRxiv and medRxiv would be better off to cut ties with CZI and become independently funded (via their sponsors or otherwise):

Since then, perceptions that these need to be independent appear to have become more widespread. In the survey conducted this week, ~80% indicated they think bioRxiv/medRxiv should disassociate themselves from CZI:

Another notable shift is that some voting “Other” did so to voice their disdain for the entire premise that preprints are a positive contribution to the scientific claims market, showing a shift in sentiment and a willingness to speak up about it. We recently saw this in a post on “The Scholarly Kitchen,” as well.

When you tally the “Other” and the “Yes,” you get more than 93% who clearly feel the entanglement with CZI LLC isn’t doing bioRxiv and medRxiv any reputational favors.

The roles of the respondents were as shown:

Here are some comments from this week’s survey:

CZI is a fraud. Bio/MedRxiv are frauds. They deserve each other. Society would be better without any of them. Bio/MedRxiv are scholarly parasites. They feed off the hosts (research and publishing infrastructure) and ultimately hurt the host over time. CZI is predatory.

Preprint servers should go away.

They’ve become untrustworthy and should close up shop altogether.

Depends on their true goals. I suspect the goal has long been to capture maximum content and feed Big Tech’s explicit desire (and many academic’s utopian fantasy) to wrest control of scholarly content from publishers.

Biomedical preprint servers have always seemed a bridge too far, but this year has been especially clarifying, with the move to openRxiv Corp. for bioRxiv and medRxiv being revealed as what looks like an acquisition by CZI LLC, which is not a charity but a for-profit tax shelter for Chan and Zuckerberg, as well as the very sketchy story about the head of medRxiv getting in bed with vaccine conspiracists around two preprints with disclosure and scientific problems galore.

Things are getting worse for bioRxiv and medRxiv on the reputation front. It was never good to begin with, no matter how much PR they promulgate. They’ve now made a deal with one of many devils in the Silicon Valley information space — you know, the one recently tied to chatbots getting sexy with children using the synthesized voices of Disney actors.

Who has fleas now?