PLOS’ Weak Response

Framed out of the real issues, PLOS tries to respond to the PNAS paper

PLOS has been quiet lately, but the PNAS paper about scientific fraud at scale led to them being called out — and yesterday they attempted to respond via a post on their site.

Let’s make this quick.

Both parties in the exchange — the authors of the PNAS paper and the editor responding for PLOS — are framing the issue incorrectly and therefore missing the point, one we addressed in our podcast last week:

  • This isn’t happening due to natural factors without somebody benefiting from it, most likely financially — this is happening because people are pushing money around the system for various reasons, mainly for profit, but potentially some of it is money laundering

This post is for paying subscribers only

Already have an account? Sign in.

Subscribe to The Geyser

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe