This Week’s Texted Discoveries

Written By: Colette Delawalla, PhD, CEO

𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗮 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁: 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧 𝘋𝘪𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘋𝘈 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 Five diabetes researchers, including the editor-in-chief of a leading medical journal, were escorted out of the American Diabetes Association’s annual conference in New Orleans by police on Friday morning. Their offense? Distributing copies of an editorial published in the ADA’s own flagship journal that criticized the Trump administration’s cuts to biomedical research funding. The incident raises profound questions about institutional courage and scientific discourse. Dr. Steven Kahn, a University of Washington professor and lead author of the editorial, along with colleagues including Dr. Aaron Kelly from the University of Minnesota, were attempting to share peer-reviewed academic commentary at a professional conference. Yet they were met with police escorts and threats of arrest. The ADA’s response was swift. In an email to Kahn, the organization stated his behavior violated the conference code of conduct. The removal occurred moments before Jay Bhattacharya, the Trump-appointed NIH director, was scheduled to deliver the keynote address. Bhattacharya ultimately canceled his appearance. The sequence suggests an organization more concerned with managing political optics than protecting scientific discourse. The editorial warned of ripple effects from federal cuts to research funding, including impacts on clinical trials and NIH staffing. These are legitimate policy concerns worthy of professional debate, not suppression. Yet the ADA’s decision to treat their distribution as a conduct violation sends a chilling message: criticize government policy at your professional peril. Dr. Kahn reflected that the ADA’s move was a “serious mistake,” and noted that professional organizations appear worried about their nonprofit status and potential repercussions from the administration, leading many to self-censor. This incident exemplifies a broader erosion of institutional independence. When professional organizations prioritize political relationships over scientific integrity, when they treat academic critique as a security threat, and when they deploy police to remove researchers from conferences, we’ve crossed into dangerous territory. Science depends on the free exchange of ideas and the ability to challenge prevailing orthodoxies. Sources: Washington Post, Seattle Times, NOLA.com

Last Friday, the American Diabetes Association censored diabetes researchers at its annual meeting who opposed the Trump administration’s NIH policies. Will “Flame of Freedom” winner Jay Bhattcharya s

A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previous limited liability protections for search engine operators don’t apply to AI overviews. In this case, Google’s AI had falsely linked two publishers to fraud and made claims that didn’t appear in any of the linked sources. The ruling could set a precedent for AI-generated content liability worldwide.

Moms are outsourcing tedious household tasks to ChatGPT and selling courses teaching others to do the same. Where are all the dads?

The AI boom is fueling a literal and metaphorical power grab by tech billionaires—and forcing a reckoning.

The petition, created by the zoo’s communications team, has 331,824 signatures and 126,599 shares.