Is arXiv Becoming aiXiv?

Back in December 2025, the announcement of an AI-fed preprint server called “aiXiv” led me to write a couple of posts about it and its most prominent lead “aithor” Rachel So.

The promotion of aiXiv followed a November 2025 ban from arXiv on computer science review papers being posted there “to tackle a surge in low quality, AI-generated content.”

• Maybe aiXiv was the result?

So began an effort to overcome the slippery slope of AI slop . . .

In January, arXiv announced it was clamping down on AI slop by requiring endorsement by an existing arXiv author for new authors.

In March, arXiv announced it was becoming an independent non-profit, using the need to raise more money to fight AI slop as part of the justification.

In May, its director announced that any errors introduced by the use of LLMs would lead to a one-year ban from the site “followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue.”

• AI is turning preprints into post-prints? Noted. Everything is upside-down.

arXiv’s problems are only mounting. There are early indications that the November ban on computer science review papers might not be addressing a bigger problem, namely a surge in computer science non-review papers with detectable LLM usage. There are many more of these, so a lower incidence doesn’t mean fewer affected papers.

• In another notable finding from arXiv postings, it seems authors have been unwittingly divulging a lot of personal information in their hastily posted and relatively unvetted preprints.
  • Hope those hungry LLMs enjoy “arguments between co-authors and to-do lists acknowledging weaknesses in the text, . . . passwords, GPS coordinates that can reveal a researcher’s home address, and application programming interface (API) keys — strings of characters that function like passwords for programmers.”

Preprints from arXiv made sense for a long time for a specialized community in high-energy and particle physics. Expanding its remit in the age of AI slop has only made it a sitting duck for bad information entering and cycling through the scientific communications space.

Maybe we don’t need to post everything? Maybe it’s time to rethink?

Can we get back to doing science?